← Back to Nashville Ballroom Challenge

Nashville Ballroom Challenge

Full resultsApr 5, 2025109 entries scored13 divisions

A division is one scored style × category × level (e.g. Silver Pro-Am Rhythm). Each card opens on its largest final; every other final at that level — age groups, single dances, scholarships — is one click away.

Rhythm

4 divisions scored

Open Pro-Am Rhythm

Largest final · 4 couples · 3 finals at this level · 6 placements

  1. 1st

    Jennifer Moss / Jamie Black

    Season Form · 20251,459±142Provisional+33vs last season
  2. 2nd

    Natalie Chantal / Danny Whitmer

  3. 3rd

    Jacquelyn Scott / David Thomas Moore

  4. 4th

    Nate Graff / Lacey Latimer

Silver Pro-Am Rhythm

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Jacquelyn Scott / David Thomas Moore

    Season Form · 20251,294±141Provisional19vs last season

Bronze Pro-Am Rhythm

Largest final · 5 couples · 4 finals at this level · 11 placements

  1. 1st

    John O'Reilly / Maja Kajtazovic

    Season Form · 20251,295±12365vs last season
  2. 2nd

    Shelley Hurst / Phillip Farley

  3. 3rd

    Ron Wilson / Simona Polmova

  4. 4th

    Jennifer Garvin / Daniel Tackett

  5. 5th

    Andrew Becker / Lacey Latimer

Bronze Amateur Rhythm

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Lisa Montgomery / partner not on file

    Season Form · 20251,500±350Provisional

Smooth

4 divisions scored

Open Pro-Am Smooth

Largest final · 5 couples · 4 finals at this level · 9 placements

  1. 1st

    Jennifer Moss / Jamie Black

    Season Form · 20251,443±128Provisional33vs last season
  2. 2nd

    Natalie Chantal / Danny Whitmer

  3. 3rd

    John O'Reilly / Maja Kajtazovic

  4. 4th

    Shelley Hurst / Phillip Farley

  5. 5th

    Nate Graff / Lacey Latimer

Silver Pro-Am Smooth

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Jacquelyn Scott / David Thomas Moore

Bronze Amateur Smooth

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements · partial placements on file

  1. 3rd

    Lisa Montgomery / partner not on file

Bronze Pro-Am Smooth

Largest final · 4 couples · 3 finals at this level · 9 placements

  1. 1st

    Andrew Becker / Lacey Latimer

    Season Form · 20251,242±135Provisional+10vs last season
  2. 2nd

    Ron Wilson / Simona Polmova

  3. 3rd

    Shelley Hurst / Phillip Farley

  4. 4th

    Jennifer Garvin / Hunter Kehoe

Latin

3 divisions scored

Open Amateur Latin

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Phyllis Gist / partner not on file

    Season Form · 20251,500±350Provisional

Bronze Amateur Latin

Final · 1 couple

  1. 1st

    Lisa Montgomery / partner not on file

Bronze Pro-Am Latin

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Jennifer Garvin / Simona Polmova

    Season Form · 20251,208±12220vs last season

Standard

2 divisions scored

Open Pro-Am Standard

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Violetta Zhao / David Thomas Moore

    Season Form · 20251,303±123Provisional

Bronze Pro-Am Standard

Largest final · 1 couple · 2 finals at this level · 2 placements

  1. 1st

    Jennifer Garvin / Hunter Kehoe

    Season Form · 20251,122±126Provisional167vs last season

Junior and youth divisions — 8 of 109 entries — are scored for FC ratings but never named here.

Season Form shown beside champions is the season number (± range) for this competition's season, read from the pool the division was scored in: the couple's number for professional and amateur finals, and the student's number for Pro-Am finals — Pro-Am rates the student, not the pro. The movement chip is the cause-labeled change the engine recorded at this comp when it has one that matches the printed number — otherwise the season-to-date move against the dancer's last season final.

Results are aggregated from public sources and count toward FC Score ratings — a community signal, not an official ranking. FilledCard is not affiliated with or endorsed by any sanctioning organization.